Be the change: A Critique of Our Commitment, by Ankur Asthana

November 20, 2009 in be the change series | Comments

Tags: , , ,

Hey there! Thanks for checking out my blog. If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed to receive updates. Thanks for visiting!

Bayard Rustin: it’s a name that is not particularly well-known to most of us. His contribution to the United States civil rights movement usually receives only surface recognition: “Bayard Rustin was a civil rights activist best known for organizing the 1963 March on Washington where Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his “I have a dream” speech.” Yet, it is probably accurate to say that without Bayard Rustin, Martin Luther King Jr. may not have become a fierce proponent of nonviolent tactics, and without Rustin, the civil rights movement - though certainly still a powerful force - would not have changed the course of American history as it did.

The example of Rustin - one of the most influential, but least-known civil rights leaders - begs the question: for those of us in this generation looking to ‘be the change’ where does our own commitment really lie? It seems that though we may commit ourselves to working in NGOs, as social entrepreneurs or in social businesses we are often more concerned with our personal experiences and advancement than building a more just world; we struggle between our own ambitions and the selfless objectivity needed to bring about meaningful change. Not everyone could play the role of Martin Luther King Jr., Ralph Abernathy, Rosa Parks or John Lewis in the civil rights movement. Many more had to be just as committed to the movement knowing that they may never receive the same positions of leadership or “personal success” that those individuals did. Yet, their contributions were as important (and in some instances, even more important) as those leaders to building a better world.

Bayard Rustin spent a good part of his younger years as a pacifist activist, and traveled to India to learn from Gandhian disciples. In 1956, following Rosa Parks courageous refusal to surrender her seat on a bus in Montgomery, Alabama, a series of boycotts erupted. Rustin traveled to Montgomery to help infuse the core ideals of non-violence into these efforts. A story from the book “Lost Prophet,” illustrates how essential Rustin’s presence was:

There were guns lying all about King’s house, and Rustin often recounted a humorous incident with himself and Bill Worty. As Worthy…prepared to sit on one of the chairs in King’s living room, Rustin called out to him, “Bill wait, wait. Couple of guns in that chair. You don’t want to shoot yourself!”

The idea of Martin Luther King having guns around his house may seem to be an oxymoron, but it also highlights just how important Rustin’s guidance were in those early periods of civil rights efforts in building a nonviolent movement. Today, Rustin’s name may not be familiar, but his impact - from non-violent protest as a key tactic, to the formation of the SCLC, to the March on Washington, to the linkages of the civil rights efforts to broader economic and social justice efforts - reverberates throughout the United States and many parts of the world.

Martin Luther King Jr. has many well-known speeches and sermons. One that is slightly less known is his “Drum-Major Instinct” speech. The “Instinct” that he refers to is the “desire in all of us to be first.” It seems that our generation needs to be able reach beyond this “Drum-Major Instinct” to dedicate ourselves to a broader cause. Just as Bayard Rustin was able to bring about tremendous change in a selfless manner, what our generation needs is continual discernment of the motivations that drive our actions while maintaining a commitment to bringing about great change.

The Author

Ankur is a rising senior at Northwestern University majoring in biomedical engineering. He is currently taking a year off from school to work full-time for GlobeMed, a network of students advancing the movement for health equity. Working with communities in rural Panama on various engineering projects, and having a summer internship at Global Health Delivery Online has heavily influenced Ankur’s thoughts about issues of poverty, structural violence, and development. Ankur is originally from the small town of Menomonie in Wisconsin, believes that Taco Bell is infinitely more satisfying than Chipotle, and enjoys a competitive game of Super Smash Brothers anytime. He also blogs at Students for Global Health Equity.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. Be the Change: Face to Face, not Facebook to Facebook, by Kevin Asuncion


  • Just want to say that I love this post, and I strongly agree with you. I think that more often than not, I let my OWN ambitions and desire for recognition come in the way of truly committing myself to a particular cause. Certainly for most people, the idea of being recognized, of being a leader, of advancing one's career, is an extremely strong draw throughout professional life. I don't think this changes throughout the generations, but I think it's definitely an issue that our generation must contend with.

    But I would also say that there are times in which personal ambition does not hinder or harm the advancement of a particular cause. Personal growth and leadership potential can often be achieved alongside passion for a cause. But the truth is that those who are often the MOST committed in the world, who are the most successful at causing change, are also often those who do not seek personal recognition and do what they see is needed without pursuing their own ambitions.

    You make excellent points; the difficulty is how? How does one develop that passion and sense of duty/commitment that overwhelms any other concerns people naturally have about being successful and advancing in one's career? I'll admit that while I care about these issues, it is also exciting to see that I have been recognized.

    Are some people born like this; is it an innate personality trait? Is society at fault, forcing most people to value recognition and ambition over a cause? Can people change their beliefs and what drives them to this extent, or must we set about changing the flawed values of society as a whole first?
blog comments powered by Disqus