Hey there! Thanks for checking out my blog. If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed to receive updates. Thanks for visiting!

Through my studies in the political science field, I’ve studied both Guantanamo Bay and the Gacaca process of post-conflict restorative justice in Rwanda in quite a bit of detail. Well, you might ask, what in the world do these two issues have in common? In essence, both alleged terrorists in Guantanamo and those on trial (mostly, or all, Hutus accused of participating in the genocide) in the Gacaca courts aren’t guaranteed a fair trial. In Guantanamo, it’s common knowledge that the accused are only tried by military commissions, generally have not had access to legal counsel or habeas corpus, and were often tortured in prison (although this is all changing).

Similarly, alleged perpetrators and genocidaires who appear before the grassroots and community-based Gacaca courts do not have access to legal representation, are tried by community members - often leading to unfair sentences imposed based on the balance of power in that particular community or region, and are sentenced by judges who mostly have no legal background.

But while issues like Guantanamo and Gacaca have garnered significant worldwide attention - primarily because of their relation to “popular” or “sexy” issues like national security and genocide - the truth is that millions of people around the world are suffering the same fate, but are mostly ignored by the world.

Most people who are imprisoned in much of the developing world - and frankly many in the United States as well - are not guaranteed legal counsel at the expense of the state; thus, they end up in jail for years without even seeing the inside of a court or hearing what they are being charged with. Arbitrary arrests are common. Prison conditions are horrible and unsanitary, with lack of basic hygiene, systematic overcrowding, and the spread of infectious diseases. In some countries like Zimbabwe, prisoners starve to death due to lack of sufficient food. And the tortures of prisoners in Guantanamo that so horrified the American public? The same brutal torture tactics are a commonality in most countries today, and are widespread as interrogation tactics.

In addition, while fair trials has become a big issue/controversy for alleged terrorists and genocidaires, most people around the world who are denied access to legal counsel and who are tortured in prison are suffering for far less severe crimes - such as robbery. Despite this, their plight receives little or no attention from the international community.

When are people going to realize this is a problem? That torture and lack of fair trials & legal representation are not limited to GITMO or Gacaca, but are problems for millions of people around the world?

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights states: “Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.” The right to a fair trial is also found in article 14(1) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. When are we, the international community, going to begin making sure these laws are actually enforced in practice?

Not just alleged terrorists or genocidaires require fair trials.  Countless poor individuals who have been caught up in the system and are effectively “invisible people” also deserve fair trials, and it’s time we started doing something about this.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Recently, I watched an excellent interview of Kevin Jon Heller of Opinio Juris, a professor of international law as well as a defense adviser for Radovan Karadzic. Karadzic is a former Bosnian Serb leader who is currently being indicted by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia for counts of genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. He is accused of genocide - namely, ethnic cleansing campaigns in Bosnia, as well as the 1995 massacre in Srebenica when Serb troops murdered about 8,000 Muslim men. Karadzic has been accused of some of the worst crimes in history — and Heller is responsible for defending him. The interview compares defending Karadzic with defending Hitler and asks: Would you defend Hitler?

This point is fascinating because it’s something people have been questioning for ages. Why - and how can you - ethically defend someone if you know they’re guilty? The reason is the honorable institution of the fair trial. Without defending both parties involved in any case, the right to a fair trial, guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution and a major civil liberty in so many countries around the world (at least on the books), is endangered. I’ve noted down the most important part of Heller’s interview below:

What really struck me was the same people who didn’t understand why I would be involved in defending a monster like Karadzic in the very next breath savagely criticized the U.S. governments for denying fair trials to the inmates at Guantanamo Bay. And I agree with the criticism of the way Guantanamo Bay detainees were treated….But it’s that blindness, that we care about giving fair trials to the accused terrorists , because I guess we think most of them are innocent, but we have no concern whatsoever with giving fair trials to someone like Dr. Karadzic. That’s what I don’t understand…The right to a fair trial extends back to the Magna Carta. This is not an optional human right that is less important than the rights of victims. I don’t think we should be prioritizing which of our human rights we want to take seriously and which  we don’t want to take seriously. To not insist upon fair trials and the right of a good defense to every accused criminal regardless of our political sympathies to them, I just think is devastating to international criminal justice in general. — Kevin Jon Heller

Being a public defender is probably one of the most difficult jobs ever. You are constantly questioned by others about the ethics of your job, and why you would even think of defending someone who has done such horrible things. But we have to think back to one of our basic human rights - the right to a fair trial. Heller makes an excellent point in stating that every criminal, regardless of the level of their crimes, deserves a fair trial. Only then can we ensure that criminal justice institutions are fair enough to save those who are in fact innocent, and to ensure the appropriate justice for those who are guilty.

So, would YOU defend Hitler?

  • Share/Save/Bookmark